Go /p/ro: • Please post images that are JPG format and ideally smaller than 1 MB, and/or about 1000 pixels on the longest side. • Expect to be judged harshly. Learn to deal with it. Want: • We come here for photos, so post yours as often as possible, even if "image unrelated" to your text. • "Flickr/500px/Tumblr/Facebook/Portfolio" threads are for critique and networking. • Use "Recent Photos" threads if you are shy or only want to post a couple of photos. • Shared raw files which we can collectively edit for discussion of post-processing techniques, are encouraged. • Use the Catalog to consolidate similar topics (photographic themes, images or technical gear threads). Do not want: • Go to /wsr/ or /r/ for specific Photoshop requests. • Gear threads are discouraged, but identified as necessary. Many users simply hide these threads. Comment too long. Click here to view the full text.
Why is fuji so incapable of making decent eyecups?prev thread >>4286424
>>4307552If you dislike aperture rings there's no reason to get a Fuji let alone use Fuji lenses over Sigma.
These are my Foojs, say something nice about them.Sadly I haven't shot much in the last year or so. Used to post with you guys a lot but there's no more passion or energy left.[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]Camera-Specific Properties:Equipment MakeGoogleCamera ModelPixel 6aCamera SoftwareSnapseed 2.0Maximum Lens Aperturef/1.7Sensing MethodOne-Chip Color AreaFocal Length (35mm Equiv)27 mmImage-Specific Properties:Horizontal Resolution72 dpiVertical Resolution72 dpiImage Created2024:04:25 22:27:56Exposure Time5003/500000 secF-Numberf/1.7Exposure ProgramNormal ProgramISO Speed Rating89Lens Aperturef/1.7Brightness3.4 EVExposure Bias0 EVSubject Distance0.52 mMetering ModeCenter Weighted AverageFlashNo Flash, CompulsoryFocal Length4.38 mmColor Space InformationsRGBImage Width2000Image Height1500RenderingCustomExposure ModeAutoWhite BalanceAutoScene Capture TypeStandardContrastNormalSaturationNormalSharpnessNormalSubject Distance RangeMacro
>>4307551true. i already have the sigma 18-50 which i like, but debating on which 23 i want as the prime option. might as well get at least one fuji lens.
so i like shooting low light and fuji is aps-c. i hear both versions, one is that aps-c is not that much worse than full frame and other is that it is. now is there a point in investing in lenses and whatnot in an aps-c system or should i not bother with that and just save money for a ff setup? i don't mind the size and weight of ff. i love the xs20 i have now but i feel like swapping to a7iv or maybe waiting for a7v (if there will be) would be better long term for me as id want to get into video as well
>>4308119Why not rent a FF system and try it out? Shoot in the conditions that you normally would with your X-S20 and see if the difference enough for you.Online opinions and reviews will only get you so far when it's a sea of mixed opinions, biases, and anecdotes.
My mom cleared out her basement and gave me her old 110 camera she used back in the day. Anyone ever shot with this format? Looks like a roll is ~$10 and dev is $12 for 24 exposures. I don’t have high hopes since the negatives are so small, but it’s portable
>>4308051yeah that's about the limit. even the "pro" bodies like the pentax and minolta 110 still don't get great sharpness despite some really nice lenses. I've heard a number of reasons for this, the film is too small, there is no backing plate putting pressure on the film to keep it flat, etc.
>>4308067To me it’s looks grainier and blurrier than could be explained by size alone. I mean if you cut out a 17x13mm rectangle out of a good sharp 35mm negative and blew it up, it would not look as bad as 110 usually does. I always assumed it was because 110 cameras were plastic disposable camera tier. But maybe the most reason so few bothered to make real cameras for the format was because it was impossible?
>>4308108I feel like the lack of flat film plane thing may be the true reason. If you examine the cartridge, technically the hard plastic backing is supposed to keep everything flat and aligned, but how much tolerance is allowed there really? There isn’t a spring plate or pressure plate or anything like that. And it doesn’t take much at all to fall out of the critical sharpness region. Though I think the scan posted here may be an exceptionally bad combination of many factors, if you look at other scans of 110 it’s not quite nearly as bad. And your idea of cutting a rectangle out of 35mm is essentially how people re-spool these cameras these days. See here an example taken with one of the top 110 cameras https://www.lomography.com/cameras/3342516-minolta-110-zoom-slr/photos/20578615?order=popular
>>4308045It's a format where everything was sacrificed to save space. Everything.
>>4308045Hi anon, 110 is a meme shitty format. You don't want to shoot it.This is a relic, it's a funky cool old school camera that's in a weird VHS tape format so it should be kept in a clearcase on a shelf somewhere but you shouldn't try to regularly shoot with it.Just admire it, for what it is.Shoot a bit for fun but don't expect anything good at all.35mm is already a small format.110 is basically micro four thirds size for reference. Due to 110's small size and analog format.. you're going to incur even bigger losses when trying to digitize it. Nobody even makes quality 110 film scanners. Just 35mm and medium format machines, you'll have to camera scan if you want to DIY any good and even a 1:1 macro on a fullframe camera won't yield good resolution from 110 film, ironically 1:1 macro on micro four thirds is a better option as the sensor is basically the same size as the film but if you want to use a bigger/better camera to scan 110, you'll want a 2x macro lens and a robust sacn setup since you'll need good alignment of focal plane and really accurate focus to get anything good.110 is an abandoned format for a reason.It's not worth the trouble, and it never delivered high quality results even with darkroom printing. Trying to digitize it is an even bigger uphill battle.
Fujichrome Provia 100F edition Previous thread >>4304705/fgt/ daily reminder (courtesy by anon): one stop per decade is (generally) bullshit>negative film ages better than positive>black and white better than color>slow films better than fast>storage conditions (dry/cool) matter more than years>Negative film is shot 1 or 2 stops overexposed and then PULLED in development so that you build more density in the exposure and develop less such that the fog is limited>slide/positive film is shot at box speed or overexposed and pulled.>if you home develop you can also use benzotriazole as a restrainer for the the first developer in E6 processUseful linksComment too long. Click here to view the full text.
finally got a nice even light box delivered to try "scanning" with my EOS R and it's night and day compared to my canoscan flatbed. picrel is a shitty test frame i've clipped and been using a lot so it's pretty scratched up and dirty now, but still. The best i could get the scanner still looked a bit soft. For 20bucks it cost me i ain't even mad, may still use it to bulk scan as a "contact sheet" type thing to see if any shots stand out to set up the camera for. i don't have a dedicated proper setup for the camera yet so for the meantime. still, impressed.[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]Camera-Specific Properties:Equipment MakeCanonCamera ModelCanon EOS RCamera SoftwareAdobe Photoshop Lightroom Classic 13.2 (Macintosh)Maximum Lens Aperturef/2.8Image-Specific Properties:Horizontal Resolution240 dpiVertical Resolution240 dpiImage Created2024:04:27 13:27:39Exposure Time1/6 secF-Numberf/8.0Exposure ProgramAperture PriorityISO Speed Rating100Lens Aperturef/8.0Exposure Bias0 EVMetering ModePatternFlashNo FlashFocal Length100.00 mmColor Space InformationsRGBRenderingNormalExposure ModeAutoWhite BalanceAutoScene Capture TypeStandard
Nikon F4, 50mm f/1.2 AI-S, Fuji Color 200[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]Camera-Specific Properties:Equipment MakeNORITSU KOKICamera ModelEZ ControllerCamera SoftwareEZ Controller 6.60.031 (160615)Image-Specific Properties:Image OrientationLeft-Hand, BottomHorizontal Resolution72 dpiVertical Resolution72 dpiColor Space InformationsRGBImage Width3130Image Height2075
[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]Camera-Specific Properties:Equipment MakeNORITSU KOKICamera ModelEZ ControllerCamera SoftwareEZ Controller 6.60.031 (160615)Image-Specific Properties:Image OrientationLeft-Hand, BottomHorizontal Resolution72 dpiVertical Resolution72 dpiColor Space InformationsRGBImage Width3130Image Height2075
what's the best way to deal with reflections and stuff when shooting through windows?[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]Camera-Specific Properties:Equipment MakeNORITSU KOKICamera ModelEZ ControllerCamera SoftwareEZ Controller 6.20.027 (141211)Image-Specific Properties:Image OrientationTop, Left-HandHorizontal Resolution72 dpiVertical Resolution72 dpiColor Space InformationsRGBImage Width3130Image Height2075
>>4308117circular polarizing filter
why are shitty digital cameras getting expensive now? did I miss some e-celeb video?
>>4308023This is accurate and true, Vinyl is obsolete but as we all know, good things must not make it to the consumer. The big corpos are evil and they have shat on digital audio by memeing the quality with post-process effects, these days the average song has less dynamic range than an old vinyl and one of the original things touted as a benefit for CD was the near limitless dynamic range available.Vinyl faggots are either hipsters or seeking less compressed sounds. It's either about the "format" or about the mix. Most people buying vinyl don't even know what the difference is and can safely be grouped under the retarded hipster faggot label, but there are some cases where buying/borrowing a vinyl and recording that can deliver a better .FLAC or .MP3 for you to then listen to instead of the CD version.Digital isn't the problem. The monkeys in the studio ruining the production before the music gets onto the CD are the issue.
>>4308035The lack of flash in phones is still kinda baffling, a flash used to be a staple in casual photography up until phones took over. Now they got a meek flashlight to splash like half a lumen on the scene, causing a 5 second or more delay between pressing the capture icon and actually recording the image.
>>4308025Artists can be paid more by generating physical value instead of by using the state to rob people and own other peoples real property. Oh, and IP laws mostly benefit “right holders” and “estates” that never created shit. Winogrand’s cousins are still upper class for having an uncle that did nothing for the world. IP laws!
>>4308023I think we’ve seen the peak of the loudness wars thanks to, of all things, the iPhone. Apple auto normalizes all the songs to -16dB and all the competing streaming services have something similar, so a producer trying to make a song louder than that will just result in it being turned out automatically.
>>4308061artists do create enough physical value, everyone just hates them for no reason, even the state with their gay little grants that are more insulting than useful
Obviously I still use my MILC, but literally iphone cameras are fucking perfect for photography in general. You can even shoot RAW and have 3 native focal lengths to choose from (3 different lenses). If the old magnum photographers could choose between an iphone or their clunky 50s film cameras they would've chosen an iphone 9/10 times.
>>4306593Ha. No... the chances become exponential once you get cell phones involved. I'm not worried about other people, humans stealing identity. I'm worried about AI, robots, etc. Non humans having access to large swathes of data at all times. If I use a digital camera, I could upload my photos offline, and process them and then save on an external device or print and delete. Photos that my wife supposedly 'delted' off her old phone can be accessed through the cloud.
>>4306045I used to be all about iPhone photography, all the way until the 14 Pro. Then I bought a fucking Canon Rebel T7 as my first DSLR and once I got the settings down with a 50mm lens, it blew my smartphone out of the water.
>>4306045>literally iphone cameras are fucking perfect for photography in generalNo, no they are not.iPhone cameras are trash memes. If you like the "iPhone look" you need to get off social media.iPhones have done irreparable damage to the human psyche and people don't even know what things are supposed to look like anymore, between their post-processing in-camera faking details and imagining shit, to ugly photo stacking techniques and hideous tone mapping for /r/shittyHDR and plenty of denoising artifacts and unsharp masking, and high pass filters out the ass.My budget android on the other hand, that actually supports RAW (not proprietary fake raw, but real RAW), is an acceptable camera.The usability is simply cancer though. If phone nigger manufacturers would give us another side button that's touch activated to serve as a shutter button, they'd be less cancerous to try and use.When the phone weighs a few ounces and has a clicky hard clicky clack clicky button for volume/power on, those buttons are not sutable for using as a psuedo shutter button, they are impossible to gently press without making the phone shake slightly. Real cameras have dual activation shutter buttons that allow a half press to engage AF then a gentle "full press" to let you more safely take the shot with minimal movement. Phones could do the same, but they don't.Instead, I use my phone to control my real camera with the app so I don't have to buy a dumb remote shutter device.Phones are great. Just not at being cameras. It's part hardware, part design. The biggest problem is badly designed products making it difficult to take decent photos.
Can anyone itt tell me why phone cameras are bad? All I'm hearing is vague shit like "it's just bad" or "it's just ugly bro" when modern phones are clearly capable of making competent pictures. Show me a comparison betweena a phone camera and a "real" camera and explains in technical terms why it's superior.
>>4308104left phone vs right 18 year old digishitone looks soft, the other looks like baby poobut for convenience phones cannot be beat
Why is it that when I'm spotted with my camera trying to take a picture of something people immediately come up and also take a picture in the same direction using their smartphones? They don't even know why or what I am looking at.Is this mental Illness of not wanting to be left out?[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]Camera-Specific Properties:Image-Specific Properties:Horizontal Resolution72 dpiVertical Resolution72 dpi
>>4295609its like all those chumps staring at things through their phone instead of enjoying life
>>4295609Probably because youre a gwc photographing tourist attractions
>>4299037awesomepost one of those pics please
Test
>>4308109we can read you loud and clear anon, over
Leicafags are an interesting species.This is a thread to try and comprehend the minds of these consumerist retards.Their subreddit, the premier place for Leica fans, has a rule explicitly stating that any photos need to "demonstrate a skill or technique that is incredibly difficult to execute correctly, has not been seen before, or both"All the photos in the subreddit do not fit this idiotic criteria, yet are lauded.99% of the posts there are about people buying gear instead of photos.They care more about being seen with a Leica than actually using it.
>>4306120>leica lenses are mediocreleica, voigt, nikon and zeiss are the only 4 manufacturers who CONSISTENTLY made god tier lenses from 1930's til today(besides MF manufactures and cine shit)
>>4306322All 4 of these consistently released horribly bad lenses as well but if you're a fanboy it's a soulful lens and if you're not a fanboy it's a bad one with a brandfag markup
oouugh fuuuuuckkkkk...[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]Camera-Specific Properties:Equipment MakeLeica Camera AGCamera ModelM8 Digital CameraCamera SoftwareAdobe Photoshop CC 2018 (Windows)Maximum Lens Aperturef/1.0Image-Specific Properties:Image OrientationTop, Left-HandHorizontal Resolution300 dpiVertical Resolution300 dpiImage Created2024:04:27 21:33:02Exposure Time1/8 secF-Numberf/2.4Exposure ProgramAperture PriorityISO Speed Rating160Lens Aperturef/2.4Exposure Bias0 EVMetering ModeCenter Weighted AverageLight SourceUnknownFlashNo Flash, AutoColor Space InformationsRGBImage Width854Image Height1500White BalanceAutoScene Capture TypeStandardUnique Image ID000000000000000000000000000033AF
>>4308098based
>>4308106i need to get a summifucks just so i can smear vaseline on the front and take 80's style snapshits with itbet that'll pull some chains
Just "found" this same camera. Pretty much brand new. How much can i scalp a retard hipster for it?[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]Camera-Specific Properties:Image-Specific Properties:Image OrientationTop, Left-HandHorizontal Resolution72 dpiVertical Resolution72 dpiColor Space InformationUncalibratedImage Width1414Image Height2000
>>4308097its a gay little mirrorless video camera though, not a real photographers camerai'll say it first, mirrorless was just a way to get cheap full frame video and now you niggas are trying to take photos with them
>>4308099If they could, they would. Between Sony, Canon and Nikon, there have been so many weird one-off models were obviously some engineer's passion project.A pocketable full frame camera is a no-brainer and would make a ton of money, and the first one to bring it to market would make a ton of money. The fact that no one has seems to suggest that it is, in fact, impossible.
>>4308102bih i dont even want a pocketable camera, just a digital F3 WITH A MIRROR which is 100% doable considering the size of the FP
>>4308103That is way more niche than a pocketable full frame. Just shoot film, nerd.
>>4308105i do, doodoohead. i just want another meme camera a'la digital leica and i know theres a market because otherwise digital leicas wouldnt exist[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]Camera-Specific Properties:Equipment MakeNIKON CORPORATIONCamera ModelNIKON D700Camera SoftwareAdobe Photoshop CC 2018 (Windows)Maximum Lens Aperturef/1.0Sensing MethodOne-Chip Color AreaColor Filter Array Pattern794Focal Length (35mm Equiv)86 mmImage-Specific Properties:Image OrientationTop, Left-HandHorizontal Resolution300 dpiVertical Resolution300 dpiImage Created2024:04:27 22:03:31Exposure Time1/250 secF-Numberf/11.0Exposure ProgramManualISO Speed Rating200Lens Aperturef/11.0Exposure Bias-1/3 EVMetering ModeCenter Weighted AverageLight SourceUnknownFlashNo FlashFocal Length86.00 mmColor Space InformationsRGBImage Width1500Image Height1200RenderingNormalExposure ModeManualWhite BalanceAutoScene Capture TypeStandardGain ControlNoneContrastNormalSaturationNormalSharpnessNormalSubject Distance RangeUnknown
Industrial town[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]Camera-Specific Properties:Equipment MakesamsungCamera ModelGalaxy S23 UltraCamera SoftwareS918USQS2CXCNSensing MethodNot DefinedFocal Length (35mm Equiv)69 mmMaximum Lens Aperturef/2.4Image-Specific Properties:Image Width1868Image Height1867Image Created2024:04:24 22:25:49Image OrientationTop, Left-HandHorizontal Resolution72 dpiVertical Resolution72 dpiImage Width4000Image Height1868ISO Speed Rating50Exposure ProgramNormal ProgramUnique Image IDL12XSPE01MF-Numberf/2.4Exposure Time24771/100000000 secFocal Length7.90 mmFlashNo FlashMetering ModeCenter Weighted AverageScene Capture TypeStandardExposure Bias0 EVWhite BalanceAutoBrightness10.5 EVExposure ModeAutoLens Aperturef/2.4Color Space InformationUncalibrated
Now that JEWKON bought red.I can already see what is going to happen to Red.Do you want to hook an external HDR OLED 8k monitor? Only the flagship model has this, the most basic is limited to 1080p.Do you want to use two SSDs instead of a single one?Only the flagship model can do it, the most basic is limited to a single ssd.It is over for red.
>>4306246Did you know that a 34mm lens used for 8x10 film would be the equivalent of using a 5mm lens on 35mm film? Bonkers.
>>4306293I thought itwas an aerial photography lens
>>4306386Maybe it was a 34 inch lens? That would be a 120mm equivalent on 8x10.
>>4306293It had a 10 inch front element
>>4301522Nah, Blackmagic still has a special looking image and BRAW is fantastic. I've been using my BPCC 4k for the last three years and the image from it outclasses cameras that are thousands of dollars more. It's a total workhorse that's taken a beating. As long a Black Magic keeps their value proposition, they'll be fine.
I bought a D700 off ebay some time in 2019ish before the youtube people made it inflate in price.I don't see a reason to upgrade, everything seems like diminishing returns. Don't need any more megapixels, autofocus is fast enough, build quality is great, body is a tank, color science is great, great lens ecosystem.What are honestly the advantages of upgrading? More muh megapixels? I don't see the point when this thing is perfect. Even the newest hottest most basedest 2024 shit is like 10% better at most, and thats in niche scenarios.
>>4305349Top kek
>>4305353fuck internal autofocus motors all my homies hate internal autofocus motorsscrewdrive niggas will live forever!!!!!!!!!!!!
>>4308066Preach, brother. Internal AF is a scam by Big Lens to screw with the used market and make us buy new.
>>4305349Is that lens not a tilt model?
>>4308079pro bodies cost less than pro lenses so why wouldnt they be the expendable partespecially used gear, why rely on a lens that might chew up its contacts when you can have a sturdy as shit screw drive and swap bodies when they inevitably die
mind-bending colour toning editionPreviously: >>4304692[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]Camera-Specific Properties:Equipment MakePENTAX CorporationCamera ModelPENTAX K10DCamera SoftwareRawTherapee 5.8Sensing MethodOne-Chip Color AreaFocal Length (35mm Equiv)54 mmImage-Specific Properties:Image Width3888Image Height2608Compression SchemeUncompressedPixel CompositionRGBImage OrientationTop, Left-HandHorizontal Resolution300 dpiVertical Resolution300 dpiImage Data ArrangementChunky FormatImage Created2006:08:09 09:39:25Exposure Time1/1000 secF-Numberf/11.0Exposure ProgramManualISO Speed Rating400Exposure Bias0 EVMetering ModeCenter Weighted AverageFlashNo FlashFocal Length36.00 mmRenderingNormalExposure ModeManualWhite BalanceManualScene Capture TypeStandardContrastNormalSaturationLowSharpnessNormalSubject Distance RangeDistant View
[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]Camera-Specific Properties:Equipment MakeCanonCamera ModelCanon EOS RPCamera SoftwareAdobe Lightroom 7.2 (Windows)Maximum Lens Aperturef/7.3Image-Specific Properties:Horizontal Resolution240 dpiVertical Resolution240 dpiImage Created2024:04:27 12:04:25Exposure Time1/2000 secF-Numberf/7.1Exposure ProgramManualISO Speed Rating640Lens Aperturef/7.1Exposure Bias0 EVMetering ModePatternFlashNo FlashFocal Length214.00 mmColor Space InformationsRGBRenderingNormalExposure ModeManualWhite BalanceAutoScene Capture TypeStandard
>>4308011canola[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]Camera-Specific Properties:Equipment MakeCanonCamera ModelCanon EOS RPCamera SoftwareAdobe Lightroom 7.2 (Windows)Maximum Lens Aperturef/7.3Image-Specific Properties:Horizontal Resolution240 dpiVertical Resolution240 dpiImage Created2024:04:27 12:08:58Exposure Time1/2000 secF-Numberf/7.1Exposure ProgramManualISO Speed Rating400Lens Aperturef/7.1Exposure Bias0 EVMetering ModePatternFlashNo FlashFocal Length236.00 mmColor Space InformationsRGBRenderingNormalExposure ModeManualWhite BalanceAutoScene Capture TypeStandard
>>4306900>>4306904>>4306977>>4306990>>4306999>>4307002>>4307481>>4307482All terrible, pleas never post here again
>>4308009Squirrels are famous for not taking directions well.[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]Camera-Specific Properties:Equipment MakeCanonCamera ModelCanon EOS 90DCamera SoftwareAdobe Photoshop Lightroom Classic 13.2 (Windows)Maximum Lens Aperturef/6.2Image-Specific Properties:Horizontal Resolution240 dpiVertical Resolution240 dpiImage Created2024:04:27 14:30:28Exposure Time1/1250 secF-Numberf/7.1Exposure ProgramShutter PriorityISO Speed Rating2000Lens Aperturef/7.1Exposure Bias0 EVMetering ModePatternFlashNo FlashFocal Length400.00 mmColor Space InformationsRGBRenderingNormalExposure ModeAutoWhite BalanceAutoScene Capture TypeStandard
[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]Camera-Specific Properties:Equipment MakeFUJIFILMCamera ModelX-T3Camera SoftwareDigital Camera X-T3 Ver4.50Maximum Lens Aperturef/1.4Sensing MethodOne-Chip Color AreaFocal Length (35mm Equiv)35 mmMaker Note Version0130Image-Specific Properties:Image OrientationTop, Left-HandHorizontal Resolution72 dpiVertical Resolution72 dpiImage Created2024:04:23 12:38:08Exposure Time1/180 secF-Numberf/4.0Exposure ProgramAperture PriorityISO Speed Rating3200Lens Aperturef/4.0Brightness2.8 EVExposure Bias1.3 EVMetering ModeCenter Weighted AverageLight SourceUnknownFlashNo FlashFocal Length23.00 mmColor Space InformationsRGBImage Width2000Image Height3000RenderingNormalExposure ModeAutoWhite BalanceAutoScene Capture TypeStandardSharpnessHardSubject Distance RangeUnknownSharpnessUnknownWhite BalanceAutoChroma SaturationHighFlash ModeUnknownFocus ModeAutoSlow Synchro ModeOffPicture ModeAperture Prior AEContinuous/Bracketing ModeOffBlur StatusOKFocus StatusOKAuto Exposure StatusOK
>automatics[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]Camera-Specific Properties:Camera SoftwareAdobe Photoshop CC 2018 (Windows)Image-Specific Properties:Image OrientationTop, Left-HandHorizontal Resolution72 dpiVertical Resolution72 dpiImage Created2024:04:27 20:51:12Color Space InformationUncalibratedImage Width620Image Height743
[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]Camera-Specific Properties:Camera SoftwareAdobe Photoshop CC 2018 (Windows)Image-Specific Properties:Image OrientationTop, Left-HandHorizontal Resolution72 dpiVertical Resolution72 dpiImage Created2024:04:27 20:20:56Color Space InformationUncalibratedImage Width1000Image Height1000
wait this isnt fucking /k/
Scilla bifolia edition[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]Camera-Specific Properties:Equipment MakeFUJIFILMCamera ModelX-S10Camera SoftwareCapture One 22 WindowsMaximum Lens Aperturef/2.8Sensing MethodOne-Chip Color AreaFocal Length (35mm Equiv)120 mmImage-Specific Properties:Horizontal Resolution300 dpiVertical Resolution300 dpiExposure Time1/180 secF-Numberf/8.0Exposure ProgramManualISO Speed Rating160Lens Aperturef/8.0Brightness5.4 EVExposure Bias0 EVMetering ModePatternLight SourceUnknownFlashFlashFocal Length80.00 mmImage Width1500Image Height1000RenderingNormalExposure ModeManualWhite BalanceAutoScene Capture TypeStandardSharpnessNormalSubject Distance RangeUnknown
>>4306513Where do you find such a goofy spider? I don't think I've ever seen one like this in person.
>>4306539australia of course, this one was just down by the creek i've also seen a christmas jewel spider(shot with extension tubes before i got my macro lens)
>>4305309Then just buy it, I don't regret the purchase at allAs long as companies offer real purchases instead of crappy licenses I'm willing to give them my money[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]Camera-Specific Properties:Equipment MakeFUJIFILMCamera ModelX-S10Camera SoftwareCapture One 22 WindowsMaximum Lens Aperturef/2.8Sensing MethodOne-Chip Color AreaFocal Length (35mm Equiv)120 mmImage-Specific Properties:Horizontal Resolution300 dpiVertical Resolution300 dpiImage Created2023:12:05 23:23:36Exposure Time1/25 secF-Numberf/8.0Exposure ProgramManualISO Speed Rating160Lens Aperturef/8.0Brightness1.2 EVExposure Bias0 EVMetering ModePatternLight SourceUnknownFlashFlashFocal Length80.00 mmImage Width1500Image Height1000RenderingNormalExposure ModeManualWhite BalanceAutoScene Capture TypeStandardSharpnessNormalSubject Distance RangeUnknown
>>4306539I saw similar stuff in central america
[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]Camera-Specific Properties:Equipment MakePanasonicCamera ModelDC-GH5M2Camera Softwaredarktable 4.6.1Maximum Lens Aperturef/2.8Focal Length (35mm Equiv)100 mmImage-Specific Properties:Image OrientationTop, Left-HandImage Created2024:04:27 20:59:46White Point Chromaticity0.3Exposure Time1/250 secF-Numberf/8.0Exposure ProgramManualISO Speed Rating800Exposure Bias0 EVMetering ModePatternLight SourceUnknownFlashFlash, CompulsoryFocal Length50.00 mmColor Space InformationsRGBImage Width2400Image Height1799RenderingCustomExposure ModeManualScene Capture TypeStandardGain ControlHigh Gain UpContrastSoftSaturationLowSharpnessHardImage QualityUnknownWhite BalanceAutoFocus ModeManualSpot ModeUnknownImage StabilizerUnknownMacro ModeNormalShooting ModeManualAudioNoFlash Bias0.00 EV
